Magis Global –


December 27, 2011

The Pumps

Category: General – Tags: – admin 1:10 pm

In connection with this increasingly popular antifreeze manufactured in an environmentally safe raw materials – propylene glycol. The use of propylene as a raw material is especially true in the case of systems heating, as it allows the use of antifreeze, as in conventional heating systems and in systems with double boiler, where there is a possibility that the anti-freeze into potable water. In this case, allowed them use as a coolant in heat exchangers at the facilities of food and coal industries, which expands the market. Propylene glycol is not toxic, even its use as food additives, but it expensive. However, due to environmental and safety use of these anti-freeze is considered more promising. Random leaks of coolant do not represent a toxicological and environmental hazards person in this room and to the environment. Despite the higher viscosity fluids based on propylene glycol have 'lubricant effect' that reduces the flow resistance (Approximately 25%) and improving the conditions of the pumps in the secondary circuit.

The coolant is stable during operation in the working temperature range for a long time does not decompose and does not oxidize. Propylene glycol promotes removal from the inner surfaces of heat exchange equipment of organic and inorganic deposits, scum. Main directions of fluids, depending on the basis of the following: Mono-ethylene glycol Propylene glycol in closed systems, heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems for residential and industrial buildings, for cooling systems of production equipment, chillers, refrigeration units, etc., working in harsh climatic conditions in air conditioning systems in the two-circuit boilers, chillers, heat exchangers food *.

December 25, 2011

Resolution Of The Government Of St. Petersburg 1813

Category: General – Tags: , – admin 1:02 pm

30 December 2010 was signed, and February 11, 2011 came into force on Resolution of the Government of Saint Petersburg of 30.12.2010 1813 defining the rules of interaction between the executive authorities of St. Petersburg construction complex. Stage of exploration work be abolished, "tselevka" remains in the form of land with preliminary approval of placement; the fate of the projects will be solve the investment expertise. Document conceived and designed to simplify the procedure for granting land for the construction. The previous order – 1592 – was adopted in 2004.

The new order is fully consistent federal laws and regulations of the Land Code. The first and second section addresses the provision of sites for auction, without the prior approval of the locations of objects. To prepare documentation for the auction, put on the need to include in the address list. He agreed in a meeting with the governor and approved by the Construction Committee. The third section concerns the procedures for preliminary approval placement of the object – the so-called tselevka. Here significant changes: thing of the past that stage, as survey work. Goal – to eliminate barriers, redundant steps in obtaining land Decree Government of St. Petersburg from 30.12.2010 1813 is determined by the order of the interaction of executive authorities of St.

Petersburg in the preparation and adoption of decisions on granting of real estate for construction and renovation of state-owned St. Petersburg. Published in the urban section of the legislation: Decree of the Government of St. Petersburg from 30.12.2010 1813 "On Approval Provision on the procedure of interaction of executive bodies of state power St. Petersburg in the preparation and adoption of decisions on granting of real estate. In St. Petersburg, is a law St. Petersburg from 17.06.2004 282-43 On the order granting real property owned by St. Petersburg for the construction and reconstruction." In accordance with the decree, be abrogated By Order in force before the adoption of decisions on granting of real estate construction and renovation, approved by the Government of St. Petersburg from 21.09.04 1592. Source: St. Petersburg State University, Office of Investment

December 13, 2011

Standards Council

Category: General – Tags: – admin 6:33 am

The lists of occupations and positions of employees who have provided washing away and neutralize the means are determined by the employer because of the nature and types of jobs agreed with the trade union committee or other authorized staff representative and approved by the head of the organization. Need to Rinse-off products is determined by the rate of not less than 400 grams month of soap or similar action by washing away the funds to an employee. In organizations where there are sanitary facilities, equipped with showers and washbasins, washing away continuously provides the means their delivery directly to employees is not performed.

When the sinks should be available in sufficient quantities regularly exchangeable towels or air dryers hands. When working with substances, allergens and irritants skin and to prevent harmful effects of biological objects are provided by workers with protective paste (ointments, creams) in an amount not less than 5 grams for a single application on a clean surface of the skin Hand sheets (face, neck, forearms) twice per shift – to work after a break for rest and meals (meals) and in other cases arising from work organization. Application of protective creams and toothpaste are washed before break for rest and food (meal) and at the end of the shift. These workers are also provided by means of washing away (by the above rules), and, if necessary – and disinfectants. Employees should be provided with regular access to washing away and neutralizing agents.

Choice of species and types of protective pastes (ointments, creams), leaves no disinfectant and is determined based on the features and character of a person employed in the matter in consultation with the territorial authorities of the state sanitary supervision. Workers should be provided only by the washing away and neutralize means, which passed the state hygienic registration. In determining the needs of the organization in detoxifying and leaves no means considered appropriate number of employees engaged in work with harmful and (or) dangerous conditions, as well as on studies related to pollution of the skin, and consumption rates of specific funds. Organizations must be in the presence of a constant monthly supply of washing away and detoxifying funds. Costs for the employees washing away and neutralize the means to set standards included in the cost of goods (works, services). The employer compensates the employee costs to acquire the necessary means of washing away and detoxifying, if workers are forced to purchase their own expense. To work with harmful and hazardous working conditions in dealing with security personnel washing away and neutralize facilities include manufacturing activities in which the skin of workers exposed to hazardous substances (GOST 12.1.007-76 ‘Hazardous substances. Classification and general requirements security ‘- is approved and put into effect the decision of the State Committee of Standards Council of Ministers on March 10, 1976 N 579, the changes are approved and put into effect the decision of the USSR State Committee Management of product quality and standards of 28 March 1990, N 625) and (or) biological objects: micro-organisms, insects and other (GOST 12.1.008-76 ‘Biosecurity. General requirements’ – is approved and put into effect the decision State Committee of Standards Council of Ministers on March 10, 1976 N 578). By washing away and neutralize facilities include soap or similar action by washing away the tools, protective paste (ointments, creams, etc.), cleaning and protect the skin from the effects of hazardous substances and biological objects, as well as disinfectants.

December 12, 2011

Crisis, How It Was And The Outcome

Category: General – Tags: – admin 6:26 pm

The development of the global financial crisis over the past two months have shown a huge impact of shifts in global markets on the economy of Russia. The crisis has shaken the confidence of the Kremlin leaders, who believed that Russia would not just recovering from the devastation and chaos of post-Soviet years, but still achieved something approaching economic invulnerability. At the same time, the crisis showed the class character of the new Russian government. Leading bureaucratic and oligarchic clans that control the key economic sectors have demonstrated their determination to allocate state resources to maintain themselves, without social consequences for tens of million workers. No substantial assistance is not available to the general public, on whose shoulders lay the burden of the crisis. The initial reaction of the Kremlin's growing financial crisis characterized by nationalist self-satisfaction and complacency.

The authorities proceeded from the fact that, thanks to huge profits gained from high prices for Russian oil, gas and other export raw materials, Russia has not threatens the financial crisis that was caused by the collapse of the housing and credit bubbles in the U.S.. Most recently, in September, statements were made that because of financial turmoil, Russia will be able to significantly strengthen its role in global economy. Russia will serve as a 'safe haven' for global investors, and offer themselves as the best of the world's leading financial centers. Even when the Russian stock market has lost the fifth of its value on September 16-17, showed no signs of serious concern on the part of Russian authorities.