Global Outsourcing Association of lawyers (GOAL)-Indian LPOs have become a high value, low risk proposition although the Indian legal process outsourcing (LPO) industry is maturing and becoming more globally accepted, there are lingering concerns about the potential risks involved in offshoring certain legal work to and sharing sensitive legal information with LPO provider. Among the most common concerns are: security and confidentiality quality ethical implications client/outside counsel relationship in response to the issues raised by the legal community, many Indian LPO providers today have taken definite steps assuage concerns and mitigate risk. Here is a round-up of some of the successful solutions that LPO providers have developed: certifications because of security and confidentiality issues, many General Counsels (GCs) are reluctant to transfer data to LPO providers, particularly those off-shore such as in India. In order to address security and confidentiality concerns, many LPO providers have implemented globally recognized processes and certifications, such as six sigma, ISO 27001, and ISO 9001 Additionally, some LPO providers are training their staff directly on specific legal commitments, and involving corporate legal personnel to lead some of these training efforts. Performance metrics corporate legal departments have feared that work performed remotely meet will not their organization’s quality standards.
However, LPO providers have been able to successfully leverage the expertise and skills acquired in the long standing business process and information technology outsourcing markets to create metrics that can be applied to the LPO world. These procedures help LPOs and GCs look-alike to monitor and assess the quality of the legal work being provided. Subsequently, performance metrics are playing a role in the development of service level agreements that hold on LPO to a particular standard of quality. Legal community collaboration and education the unauthorized practice of law is one of the major concerns for U.S. GCs when considering the LPO model.
But, the LPO industry at large has collaborated with the American Bar Association (ABA) to clarify the role of LPO services in legal work and to delineate on LPO provider’s responsibilities in that schematic. In parallel with these efforts, the ABA has developed guidelines for engaging in LPO provider. Federal Reserve Bank shines more light on the discussion. LPO providers are working to educate the legal community on the benefits of the LPO model for inside and outside counsel. As a result, better oversight strategies are being developed that enhance the entire LPO system. Hybrid onshore/offshore model a long time for, the term “off-shoring” had a negative connotation, particularly for lawyers in US law firms and corporate legal departments who feared job loss. To overcome these negative perceptions that many LPOs are now offering combined onshore/offshore solutions to clients. So, some Indian LPOs have expanded their operations in relatively low – wage “near-shore” locations so that work can be performed closer to a client’s headquarters but still at a competitive price. The LPO industry continues to evolve, but there is no reason to avoid the discussion today. Strategic use of LPO provider has already proven to lower legal costs without sacrificing quality. Source @ global outsourcing Association of lawyers (GOAL)