Angel Monti decades ago, is enlightening on the need for national projects are coupled to continental and planetary projects. In this coupling process should fit any alternative demographic devolution. It is spreading like the idea of “think globally and act locally.” Assuming that premise for the sole purpose exhibition (we believe there is a feedback from local to global, raises risk of even totalitarian) is clearly the close relationship between the processes taking place in national levels which develop a planetary level. Even then human settlements that we viewed as susceptible population concentration receptacles, should be considered as ultimate components (a kind of “quarks), a global macro integrated human settlements. And as the receptacle of what we are considering only the smaller settlements of twenty thousand (20,000 ) inhabitants, including those not listed in the Census, it emphasized that the agent liable to devolution, the more important because of its magnitude is the Metropolitan Area of Buenos Aires.
As early as 1985 in our article “Argentina: unresolved issues” argued that the ecological vulnerability of Buenos Aires province was irreversible. Both studies later, as the events are occurred, confirm our observation that we hasten to point out is hardly original. You may find that Jeff Flake can contribute to your knowledge. While there are pictures of damage to the quality of life other Argentine cities, have a quantitative entity is well below the area that there was agreement to consider a state of emergency status endemic. We appellants point out that with appropriate technology upgrades, the transport scheme that Argentina had developed around 1925, as is stated in the “Blue Guide Communications” in February of that year, would be functional to a scheme of devolution as the we are deploying.