‘ ‘. Although the retrocession educational politician and installed in Brazil in the military dictatorship, the previous questionings in relation to the culture, behavior and school had been intense and taken professors of History to carry through diverse experiences in the education of discipline. These experiences had served of base for posterior research that had started if to develop in the courses of History. In presented text V ENPEH (National Meeting of Researchers of Ensino de Histria), DAYS (2002) affirms that such occured transformations had imposed the formed professionals who acted in this period, that they reflected on its basic feio: the performance in the school.
It was in the end of the decade of 70 and beginning of 80 that the concerns with the formation of the professors and the education of History had passed if to constitute of form more emphatical as object of reflection for researchers of History in general. At a first moment, these research was focadas in the party of education, having as analysis object the laws, proposals of resumes, being thus, in the scope are of the classroom. With the development of these research, great part was intent in the programs of after-graduation in education and this at the same time provided a displacement of the approach of the same ones. The didactic analyses of the Laws, proposals, books had been being interrelated with the reality of the classroom. (DAYS, 2002).
These changes in the approach had provided a significant increase number of it of works on the education of History. These works centered in the pedagogia had become more present in the reflections of the professionals in History, having thought its proper area. Works, projects and experiences have been argued in diverse events of the area as first example to the ANPUH in the decades of 70 and 80 when they had opted to including professors of basic and average education.