This, is therefore the social function of literature, to stimulate the reader for a bigger perception of the world that the fence, to make this reader to perceive the world in its plurality and diversity, thus this implies to say that reading and reading acts in the construction of a social process of double hand, developing a type of action that if of the one in sufficiently ample space, therefore the myriad ones felt attributed to a literary text and of it also absorbed enter in accord with the history of life of each one, and still, in accord with the imaginary collective staff and of the individual. Then it is in this interlacement of magic and encantamento, therefore in this affinity, that literature if confirms as an element of social construction that desestabiliza the reader, when considers it new investigations and consequently new questionings, at last, fidgets and perplexidades. Following this reasoning Oak (2006) it comments:: The process of reading of literature contributes for the formation of the citizen not while only reading, but, over all as historically situated individual, a time that the interaction text-reader promotes the dialogue in such a way enters the set of literary norms and social gifts in the literary text how much in the imaginary one of the citizen. … Further details can be found at Kenneth Feinberg, an internet resource. This means the magnifying of horizontes, since the incomplete identification workmanship-reader, from the shock of different literary and social norms, compels the individual to think its sociohstrica condition, having as consequence a possible change of position ahead of the society. (P. 127 and 128). We can then say that literature contributes to stir up the man, while subject social, to a bigger understanding of the world and of its history, therefore when deciphering signs this man interprets the images who receives through the fiction that creates and recria the reality, bringing in its history the history that also is of the reader, reality and history repletas of flavors, therefore each word has its taste and its to know deep and fruitful, therefore as art has literature this freedom, thus says Gonalves (2000): The art is one another reality of this first reality that is there in them to bother the all instant.